Choose a publicly traded company that begins with the same letter as your last name(E). Using either the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Edgar Datab

 The student will post one thread of at least 400 words .

 Choose a publicly traded company that begins with the same letter as your last name(E). Using either the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Edgar Database, or by going directly to your chosen company’s website, download the company’s annual report. Review the information contained within the annual report (10k), paying particular attention to the financial statements and the notes to the financial statements. How important do the financial statements appear to be with regard to the annual report? Are the financial statements mentioned in the management discussion? Do the financial statements provide enough information to potential investors? Is too much information given to competitors who may also be reviewing the financial statements? Explain the significance of the financial statements within the annual report. In your replies, compare your company with your classmates’ and discuss the similarities or differences between your chosen companies. 

Criteria Ratings Points

Original Thread – Key Components

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

All key components of the Discussion are answered in a clear and logical flow for the original thread.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

Most of the key components of the Discussion are answered in a clear and logical flow for the original thread.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Key components of the Discussion are missing, or there is not a clear and logical flow for the original thread.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Original Thread – Mechanics and Word Count

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

The 400-word limit was fully met on the original posting. There were no more than three spelling, grammar, or APA errors in the original posting.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

Student wrote less than the minimum word count, but more than ½ of the required words. There were four or five spelling, grammar, or APA errors in the original posting.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Student wrote less than ½ of the required words. There were six or more spelling, grammar, or APA errors in the original posting.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Replies – Major Points

8 to >6.0 pts

Advanced

There is thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts). There are at least two substantive replies to other students.

6 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

There was some analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts), but a stronger connection could have been made. There were two substantive replies to other students.

4 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There was very little analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts). There was only one substantive reply made to another student.

0 pts

Not Present

8 pts

Original Thread – Support

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

The post is supported by two or more scholarly references.

8 to >6.0 pts

Developing

The post is supported by two scholarly references.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The post contains one scholarly reference.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Replies – Mechanics and Word Count

7 to >5.0 pts

Advanced

The 200-word limit was fully met on the replies. There were no more than three spelling, grammar, or APA errors in the original posting.

5 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

Student wrote less than the minimum word count, but more than ½ of the required words. There were four or five spelling, grammar, or APA errors in the original posting.

3 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Student wrote less than ½ of the required words. There were six or more spelling, grammar, or APA errors in the original posting.

0 pts

Not Present

7 pts

Discussion Grading Rubric | ACCT209_D02_202440

Criteria Ratings Points

Replies – Support

5 to >4.0 pts

Advanced

Each reply is supported by at least two peer-reviewed references.

4 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

One reply does not include two scholarly references.

3 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Both replies do not include two scholarly references.

0 pts

Not Present

5 pts

Total Points: 50

Discussion Grading Rubric | ACCT209_D02_202440

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered